ANC · Design & Creative

The design programme:
what exists, what doesn't.

Every design ask from every meeting, gathered and reconciled against the live system. Not what was promised — what is actually running, measured in the database today.

19 Aug 20263 calls + 8 months of logged asksVerified against live DB & SFTP
0 of 38
Design tickets created in the dashboard this month

All 38 August tickets arrived as mirrors from the old project tracker. The design module is fully built and nobody is originating work in it. Adoption ran 27 in April, then 1, 5, 18 — and now zero. Everything below is downstream of that one fact.

Section 01

There are three design programmes, not one

These get conflated in every conversation. They have different owners, different systems, and different states. Treating them as one thing is why the asks feel endless.

Services Design

ALEXIS · JOE

Game-day graphics, CG backgrounds, print, content scheduling, designer hours. Lives in the Service Dashboard. This is the big one — 20,506 tickets of history.

Built · Not adopted

Sales-support Design

DANIEL CROCI · VIA NATALIA

Pre-sale renderings and pitch collateral. Explicitly not services work — belongs near Opportunities in the CRM. Natalia compressed his hub to a saved view.

Parked by Natalia

AI Designer

CHARLIE · NEW 19 AUG

Replace the outsourced design vendor. Brief plus assets in, proof out. Needs to work by late October to leave testing room before busy season.

Not started
Section 02

What we have

Every row below is built, deployed and reachable right now. The counts are live from the operations database — they separate what people actually use from what merely exists.

CapabilityIn useVerdict
Design ticket system Full lifecycle, statuses, assignment, comments, priority flags, activity timeline
20,506
Mirror only Complete, but fed by the old tracker
Designer hours tracking Time entries against tickets, per-venue budgets, unlimited-contract handling
23,988
Genuinely used The most-adopted thing we built
Content scheduling Operator assignment, launch dates, per-venue schedules
3,036
Live Real volume, working
CG design requests Separate pipeline for live-game stat backgrounds
633
Partial Built; parity items still queued
Proof server connection Read-only link to ANC's own storage — 52 root folders, ~20,000 proof directories
Live
Verified today Legacy ciphers, IPv4 pinned
Client proof review Shareable link, per-file approve or request-changes, client uploads, permanent URLs
55
Barely touched 18 answered in all of 2026
Print requests Shipping addresses, comments, status workflow
21
Skeleton Built, essentially unused
Recurring-client templates Alexis's #2 wishlist item — build a ticket from a saved template
1
Shipped, never used One template exists
Assignment emails Branded mail to the assignee, straight to the ticket
Live
Working Alexis's ask is already built
Design AI actions Create, search, assign, update, move to client review, generate signage proof
6
Wired Assistant can drive the pipeline
Ticket file handling Versioned files attached to a design ticket
9
Effectively dead Assets live on storage, not tickets

The pattern in that table

Everything that helps a person do their existing job faster got adopted — hours tracking at 23,988 entries, content scheduling at 3,036. Everything that asks someone to change where they work did not: proofs at 55, templates at 1, ticket files at 9.

That is not a product-quality problem. It is a switching-cost problem, and the switching cost has one specific cause — see below.

Section 03

Why none of it is being used

Measured, not guessed. Three findings from the live system that explain the zero.

A

Half the company never hears from the dashboard

Status changes notify by chat message only, and silently skip anyone without a chat account linked. 189 active staff, 90 linked, 99 not. All 189 have an email address on file. Alexis's team went back to the old tracker because things were getting lost — they were: the notification had nowhere to go.

SOURCE Alexis, 19 Aug call · verified in staff table
B

Nothing is being deleted from briefs — the sync only carries a link

Briefs have grown longer every year: 441 characters average in 2019, 879 in 2026, the richest on record. The one-line tickets are the old tracker's backlink and nothing else. The detail still exists on the other side and fills in as the team migrates. There is a genuine 6% of vague briefs — that is a real cost, and it is an intake problem, not a data-loss problem.

SOURCE Charlie, 19 Aug call · 20,506 tickets measured
C

Assets never lived in the ticket, so the ticket was never the job

Nine files across twenty thousand tickets. Account managers move assets to storage by hand and paste a path. Some clients still ship a physical hard drive. The ticket is a description of work that happens somewhere else — which is exactly why nobody defends it as the system of record.

SOURCE Charlie walkthrough · design_request_files
Section 04

What needs building

In the order that makes each next thing cheaper. The first item unblocks the migration; the migration unblocks everything else.

01

Status changes by email

Reuse the branded mail path assignment notices already use; keep chat for the 90 who have it. Additive, small, and the single thing standing between Alexis's team and leaving the old tracker. Joe is already paying out that contract and killing it after this year.

ASKED BY Alexis · 19 Aug, with Joe endorsing
02

Brief gating at intake

Block submission until the creative direction, board specs and assets are actually filled in. Kills the 6% vague-brief tail at source, which is what drives the revision rounds that make graphics unprofitable. Daniel asked for exactly this in April and it was parked — Charlie independently arrived at the same problem in August.

ASKED BY Daniel Croci Apr · Charlie Aug · same fix
03

Finish the cutover, then retire the old tracker

Alexis's four remaining wishlist items are the actual price of migration: duplicate a request, templates per recurring client, the venue-tree sidebar, and day-before reminders. Templates already exist and have one record — the feature shipped without the content.

ASKED BY Alexis · locked priority order, 1 May
04

The AI designer pipeline

Charlie's new one and the only item with money attached — he wants it billed per credit and called the revenue guaranteed year after year. Brief plus assets in, proof out, into the existing approval flow. The pieces are unusually ready: the proof server is connected, the approval workflow is live, and image generation is already wired into the assistant.

ASKED BY Charlie · 19 Aug · needs to work by late October
05

Proof adoption, not proof features

The client review flow is finished and has 55 shares to show for it. Nothing here needs building — it needs to become the default path out of a design ticket instead of an option beside it.

BUILT · awaiting the cutover above
06

CG, print and content-schedule parity

Queued behind design sign-off by Alexis's own sequencing. Print has 21 records and is a skeleton. Do not start these before 01 through 03 land.

QUEUED · after design module sign-off
07

Daniel's sales-support hub

Full wishlist parked by Natalia and compressed to a saved view. Do not reopen without her — this is a political gate, not a technical one.

GATED BY Natalia · unchanged since April

One risk that sits under all of it

The storage holding every proof and every finished asset is about 55 TB, currently under 10% free with busy season starting, and has no backup — the spend was declined. The same leadership wants the data centre gone entirely at a quarter million a year.

Anything built on top of that storage inherits that risk. Worth putting in writing before the AI designer work starts, not after.